Skip to content
Zoios

Solution

Employee engagement surveys, made simple

Find out how engaged your people are with surveys that take minutes to set up and produce insight your leaders will actually use.

People & Culture teams that lead with Zoios

VeoRejsekorte-BoksDonkey RepublicBech-BruunSoundboksKOMBITRoskilde FestivalECIT
01 / 07

Questions backed by science.

Our surveys are built on scientifically validated questions, battle-tested and benchmarked across 1,000+ teams in 47 countries. You're not measuring fluff; you're working with real data.

  • 11 validated Pulse questions
  • Industry & company-size benchmarks
  • Data-driven measurements
Benchmark · Tech · 800 teams
Engagement distribution
Top 20%Top 10%Industry 78You · 755060708090100
02 / 07

Honest feedback, because it's anonymous.

Responses are end-to-end encrypted and aggregated only when teams are large enough to protect identity. Employees speak freely; you hear what they actually think.

  • AES-256 end-to-end encryption
  • Strong anonymization protocols
  • SOC 2 Type II certified
HRSafe
6 people
From anonymous
"Onboarding flow improved a lot"
From anonymous
"Manager actually listens now"
FinanceSafe
7 people
From anonymous
"Q-end pressure is intense"
From anonymous
"Need clearer ownership on close"
DesignHidden
3 people
⚠ too small
need 2 more
03 / 07

No manual work. Runs on auto-pilot.

Sync your team, send the survey, and Zoios handles the rest: reminders, segmentation, anonymization, benchmarking, analysis, and a tailored report for every team. End-to-end on auto-pilot.

  • Employee sync · CSV or HRIS
  • Mail + Slack send-out & reminders
  • Reports built per team, every cycle
End-to-end automation
Nightly sync · Real-time pipeline
Employee syncNightly · 00:00
412 employees · auto-synced from HRIS
Survey send-outReal-time
mail + Slack · the moment a pulse goes live
Reminders sentReal-time
nudge non-responders automatically
SegmentationReal-time
splitting by team · region · tenure
AnonymizationReal-time
hash · k ≥ 5
BenchmarkingReal-time
vs. industry · vs. previous
Analysis & recommendationsReal-time
AI root-cause · suggested actions
Build report (per team)Real-time
live dashboards · 24 reports
04 / 07

Catch problems before they grow.

Run pulse surveys at the cadence that fits your team, monthly or quarterly. They surface drift weeks before an annual survey would. Spot the early signal, like optimism in Engineering dipping after a strategy shift, and act before it becomes a people problem.

  • Monthly or quarterly cadence
  • Anomaly detection per team
  • See reason for drop or uplift
Optimism · Engineering
Optimism, last 5 pulses + projection
Strategy shift
JanFebMarAprMay
!
Optimism in Engineering is dropping
likely cause: new strategic direction · -19 over 3 months
05 / 07

AI that finds the root cause.

Trained on thousands of teams, our models cluster open comments, attribute the underlying causes, and recommend concrete actions you can take this week.

  • Qualitative feedback analysis
  • Root-cause attribution per theme
  • Ranked action recommendations
147 comments · 3 root causes
147Comments
42%Meeting overload
Block focus time
28%Career path unclear
Deploy a leveling framework
18%Tool fragmentation
Audit overlap
06 / 07

See which teams need attention.

Every team gets a live engagement and strain score, along with trend lines. Themes sorted by urgency. Drill into the root cause behind the issue, and walk into your next 1:1 already knowing which conversation matters most.

  • Engagement & strain score per team
  • See every theme as it develops
  • Concrete action recommendations
Attention queue
Sorted by priority
01
Engineering
Well-being · -11%
59
02
Sales
Workload · -6%
68
03
Operations
Recognition · 0%
74
04
Marketing
Life harmony · +2%
78
05
Product
Support · +3%
80
06
Customer Success
Contribution · +5%
86
07 / 07

Useful for every role.

Executives get the org-wide picture. Managers get a report tuned to their team. Teams get a conversation guide for their next retro. One survey, three audiences, each with exactly what they need.

  • Executive view · org-wide signals
  • Manager view · team-level drilldown
  • Team view · conversation guide
One pulse · insights for every role
Pulse data
79 responses (93%)
Executive
Exec + HR
Org-wide insights
Company overview
Org. trends
Cross-team heatmaps
Manager
Per manager
Team report
Team health score
Drivers & detractors
Recommended actions
Team
Per team
Discussion guide
Talking points
Shared wins
Open questions
Average six-month uplift

Numbers that move.

Across customers who adopt Zoios and act on the signals.

+14%
job satisfaction
+18%
well-being
−19%
work stress

The harder truth

Why measuring employee engagement is harder than it looks

Employee engagement sounds simple. Are people thriving? Are they motivated? Do they care about their work? But most companies turn this straightforward concept into a bureaucratic mess that produces data nobody uses.

The typical approach: annual survey, 60 questions, designed by a committee of executives who have never actually filled one out themselves. By the time results trickle down to managers, the data is months old and the workplace has completely changed. Nobody takes action because nobody knows what action to take.

Your employees' engagement levels change weekly based on projects, deadlines, team dynamics, and a hundred other factors. Measuring it once a year is like checking your bank account in January and assuming the balance stays the same until December.

3 common mistakes

The 3 mistakes companies make with engagement surveys

Mistake 1: Asking vague questions that don't predict anything

"Do you feel valued?", "Are you aligned with company values?", "Would you describe our culture as collaborative?" These questions sound professional, but they don't tell you whether someone is actually engaged or about to quit.

The problem with vague, "feel good" questions is that they don't correlate with actual outcomes. Someone can feel "valued" and still leave for a 10% raise. Someone can say the culture is "collaborative" while secretly hating their job.

Scientific research has identified specific drivers that actually predict whether employees are thriving and motivated: autonomy, recognition, development opportunities, workload balance, role clarity, and connection to the work itself. Ask about those. Not about abstract concepts like "alignment" or "culture."

Using a validated framework also gives you industry benchmarks. Without benchmarks, you have no idea if your engagement score of 65 is actually good or terrible.

Mistake 2: Death by survey length

Here's what happens with long employee engagement surveys: your most disengaged employees don't finish them. Your most engaged employees begrudgingly complete them out of loyalty. Your middle 60% (the people you actually need data from) abandon them halfway through.

A 40-question survey doesn't give you 4x more insights than a 10-question survey. It gives you survey fatigue, declining response rates, and less honest answers as people rush through just to finish.

Keep it under 15 questions. Use mostly quantitative ratings (faster to answer) with one or two targeted open-ended questions. And for the love of everything, don't ask people to manually type in their department, tenure, and role. Your platform should already have that information and apply it automatically in the analysis.

One more thing: smart conditional questions. If someone rates "recognition" low, immediately ask "What type of recognition matters most to you?" That gets you 30% more useful feedback than a generic comment box at the end asking "anything else to add?"

Mistake 3: The annual engagement theatre

Annual engagement surveys are performative. HR launches them, executives review company-wide scores, maybe there's a town hall where leadership says "we hear you and we're working on it," and then... nothing changes for another 12 months.

Why? Because employee engagement isn't static. The person who was thriving in Q1 might be burned out by Q3 after a brutal project deadline. The team that had great scores in March might have a new manager in August who's driving everyone away. Annual measurement can't catch any of this.

Track employee engagement monthly or quarterly. Yes, it's more work. But it's the only way to spot declining motivation before it becomes turnover. If you wait a full year between measurements, you're not measuring engagement in an actionable way.

3 criteria for success

The 3 things that actually make engagement measurement work

Most companies fail at execution, not survey design. They finally get a good 10-question survey, launch it quarterly, and then completely botch everything that happens next. Here's what you actually need to succeed.

Criterion 1: Get 80%+ of people to actually respond

Low response rates kill engagement measurement. If only 45% of employees respond, you're not measuring engagement, but rather who has strong feelings (very engaged or very disengaged). The quiet majority in the middle, the people actually at risk of leaving, didn't bother answering.

Here's the unglamorous truth: you have to send reminders. Multiple reminders. Our data shows each reminder gets roughly 50% of remaining non-responders to answer. First reminder: 50% of holdouts respond. Second: 25% more. Third: 13% more. That's how you get from 50% to 90%.

Use tools that automate this and only remind people who haven't responded yet. Send reminders via both email and Slack (engineers especially live in Slack, not email). Make the survey accessible on mobile. Remove every possible friction point.

Criterion 2: Get insights to managers within a few days

Employee engagement data has a shelf life. If managers get their team reports 6 weeks after the survey closed, they're looking at old news. The stressed team member who scored low? They've already resigned. The project causing burnout? It finished three weeks ago.

Aim for reports to be ready within 1-2 days of the survey closing. Keep the survey window short (we recommend 1-2 weeks) so results represent a consistent snapshot, not a month-long rolling average of changing sentiment.

Modern software with real-time analytics makes this possible. As responses come in, dashboards update automatically. No waiting for someone to manually compile spreadsheets or build PowerPoint decks. The data should be accessible the moment the survey closes.

Criterion 3: Tell managers what to do, not just what the scores are

Most managers stare at engagement scores and think "okay, my team scored 67 on motivation and 72 on recognition... now what?" They're busy running projects, hitting deadlines, and managing daily operations. They don't have time to become amateur organizational psychologists.

Convert data into action. Show them: "Your team's engagement dropped because workload and role clarity both declined. Here are three specific things to address this: 1) Review project allocations in your next team meeting. 2) Have 1:1s focused on priority clarification. 3) Discuss realistic timelines for current commitments."

AI-powered platforms can do this automatically for every team. If you're building this manually, assign an HR partner to sit with each manager and translate scores into specific, concrete actions they can take this week.

Customers

What our customers say.

Gut feelings, validated by data.

You can granulate the data and have more detail in terms of what is happening. So when we have a feeling we can actually validate if it's something we need to tackle or not. That's very powerful.

Gabrielle Damgaard-Mørk

Chief People Officer, 24Slides

Trends that drive everyday dialogue.

We can follow the trends and facilitate dialogues to make small or large changes in our everyday work-life, to ensure we accommodate what motivates people and develops them as consultants.

Helene Sarkel

Partner, NoA Connect

Frequently asked

  • What does engagement actually measure?

    We track the drivers that predict engagement: autonomy, recognition, development, workload balance, role clarity, and connection to the work.

  • How long is the survey?

    About 2 minutes. A 40-question survey does not give you 4x more insight, just survey fatigue.

  • Is it anonymous?

    Yes. We aggregate results and never expose individuals, even in small groups.

  • What do leaders get out of it?

    Insights within a couple of days, segmented by department and tenure, with concrete actions tied to what their data says.

Get started

Listen to your people. Act on what you hear.

Set up takes 5 minutes. The first month of Pro is on us.